Studies show hands-free devices are still unsafe! How your brain causes car accidents.
To learn more about cognitive distraction in drivers and how you can help visit http://www.distraction.gov
We all do it. We’re late for work so we take our breakfast with us in the car. We’re stuck in gridlock so we check our reflection and fix our hair. We fumble with the dial or reset the GPS without pulling over. Drivers are infamous for multitasking behind the wheel. We pretty much assume it’s a survival skill for the demanding, modern world. In the past decade, we’ve added mobile phone calls, texts and even web browsing to the list creating a brand new class of peril that rivals drunk driving.
At least Bluetooth and voice-activated technologies minimize these risks, right?
There is no safety advantage to using a hands-free device instead of a handheld one (University of Utah, NSC and the AAA foundation)
Having a remote (cellular) conversation is like driving with 0.08 percent blood alcohol content (BAC)—enough to warrant a DUI in most states (University of Utah)
You are as likely to get hit in states that restrict the use of handheld devices as ones that don’t (The Highway Loss Data Institute)
Of all activities people do in the car, composing a voice-activated text causes the highest level of cognitive disruption—twice that of handheld calls (AAA foundation)
Frequent multitaskers falsely believe they are good at it. In actuality, the more often you multitask the more easily-distracted—and the more at risk—you will become (Stanford University)
The laws meant to protect us haven’t caught up yet. Mobile technology infiltrated our lives quickly (remember the iPhone was released just four years ago) and we are just beginning to understand how it effects driving.
The NHTSA, the NSC, State DOTs and countless other organizations are scrambling to address the issue, but currently there are no nationally recognized guidelines for managing cognitive distraction while driving. To stay safe behind the wheel, we need to know what’s happening under our hood. The list below can help you understand—and explain—cognitive distraction:
Ever heard yourself say “That came out of nowhere,” while you were driving? Most likely, you were having difficulty with information processing. This distraction is associated with verbal engagement–listening for comprehension, composing responses, and thinking through a problem–which uses sections of the brain responsible for abstract thinking.
A 2008 MRI study by Carnegie Mellon University illustrated the cognitive changes caused by verbal engagement by asking subjects to comprehend spoken sentences. Results showed activity in the parietal lobe— the critical portion that aid depth perception and spatial awareness—dropped by 37 percent.
What does this condition look like behind the wheel? The studies on multitasking while driving frequently refer to “inattention blindness,” where drivers lack awareness of new objects entering their field of vision. In other words, they might “see” bikers, stop signs, and even traffic signals, but not know they’re there. Additionally, these drivers experience “tunnel vision,” meaning they hyper-focus on the road directly in front of them. Unfortunately, interruptions—including merging traffic and pedestrians—tend to come from the periphery. Drivers talking on the phone, according to the studies, have up to a 10 percent reduction in reaction time and are more likely swerve into the next lane without realizing it.
The length of time compounds the danger. Drivers usually begin phone conversations while stopped at an intersection or stuck in a traffic jam, when the risk of accident is perceived to be lower. When activity resumes, however, the driver’s cognitive function is already impaired. They may continue the activity without realizing their visual perception has changed.
Talking to the person in the next seat, on the other hand, tends to be less problematic because a responsible passenger generally overcompensates for the driver’s lost perception by pointing out turn lanes or oncoming danger. Plus they can see when the road is getting rough and the driver needs silence. Radio at a normal level is usually not a problem, but thought-provoking audio books and podcasts can be, according to a 2013 report by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
Voice-command technology—especially for texting— interrupts information processing. By this logic, newfangled dashboard apps for hands-free email and Facebook updates are probably more dangerous than we realize.
Texting takes seconds and so do accidents. The false perception that it can be performed before the road changes has helped make texting a leading cause of auto-related death in the United States. Studies claim that texting forces “attention switching,” meaning the driver’s focus is alternating between reading, composing and sending texts and the scenario unfolding on the road.
During this interval, their facilities—hands, eyes and brain—are fully compromised. The back-and-forth cycle makes a driver vulnerable to unpredictable events such as a child running into the street or a sudden halt from the car in front. The problem, however, isn’t limited to texting. Manipulating an audio device, rerouting a GPS or making adjustments to the dashboard without pulling over first can also be considered attention switching.
Multitasking behind the wheel by grooming, eating, or checking directions while you drive became public habit long before mobile technology. But has it gotten worse? In the recently published Pulitzer Prize nominated book, The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to our Brain, Nicholas Carr claims digital reality has primed our minds for distraction. Inside a car, this can pull us towards food, a hairbrush or a mobile device almost subconsciously.
By recent estimates, over 40 percent of female drivers apply makeup on their way to work and over 80 percent of all drivers eat food from behind the wheel in the United States. In the UK, a country whose population is 20 percent of the United States’, women who apply makeup while driving cause a half million car crashes annually.
Studies have compared electronic attachment to substance abuse. When asked to refrain from devices, heavy users exhibit withdrawal symptoms including anxiety and paranoia and even physical responses like headaches and nausea—sometimes in a matter of minutes. That might explain why, at any given moment, 660,000 drivers are handling electronic devices in the United States, according to NHTSA. These drivers might know it’s wrong, but it’s easy to feed the urge all alone inside the car.
Not engaging with an automated device or any other distraction while in your vehicle is a cornerstone of driver safety. But it’s not the whole picture. Our brains, like our biceps, adapt to the way they’re used. Frequently flipping between screens may physiologically alter the ability to focus, a Stanford study on digital media multitasking discovered.
“Heavy multimedia users are more likely to respond to stimuli outside the realm of their immediate task,” the study says. “They may be sacrificing performance on the primary task to let in other sources of information.”
And so it goes. In the digital age, letting your mind jump from composing email to planning dinner to trying to remembering who you need to call feels normal. That doesn’t change just because you’re looking straight ahead with both hands on the wheel.
Image Credit: Jon Olav on Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonolave/
Dana Henry is a Content Strategist for Traffic Safety Store. After years working as a reporter and editor for print and online publications, Dana has developed her focus on emerging technology and innovation. She resides in Philadelphia and is an avid cyclist.
View all posts by Dana Henry